I have seen things from different angles. Enough not to take things at
face value, and the market value is bunk though both contain truth of a
sort. Take reincarnation for example, how many people and how many
experiences of what sort and how much linguistic advancement did it take
to get the picture out there, or karma? To me you might as well be
talking about technological advancement, a few individuals here and
there can multiply the cognitive product of mankind by a multitude of
generations. Trying to sort out how parallel vs progressive timelines
relate to incorporeal cosmologies is like trying to explain algebra to
my dog. There is something to it, I am as certain of that as my own
(relative at least) existence, but I think we still have no idea how to
use it or what it is. It is frustrating! So, my prior post was a not so
funny joke, and another caveat about face value (with me as the butt).
On 9/26/2012 11:34 PM, James wrote:
Funny, it would really suck to wake up to find nothing, but then we
aren't supposed to see that (hypothetically of course).
On 9/25/2012 4:10 AM, RP Singh wrote:
James , your ' conscious being ' is a proof that God exists. When you
are in a coma you would be in no position to entertain any belief.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:07 AM, James<[email protected]> wrote:
Would this mean then that a person in a coma is proof the God doesn't
exist?
Otherwise, how would the existence of a conscious being prove
anything other
than that it exists? Which I may see as much more, but that is
besides the
point of proof.
On 9/23/2012 10:20 AM, RP Singh wrote:
Conscious beings are a proof of God because otherwise an unconscious
Being could not be said to exist. Existence is the seed which finds its
growth in life.
--
--
--
