It is WE - you and I each - who has need of ethics, so that we know how to 
think, assess and act at situations we face and live through.

I always clarifies through our interaction with others, its consequence, 
untill we happen to obtain the social view.

If you can live without ethics, try it ! Then let us know something real...

On Friday, October 19, 2012 1:22:13 AM UTC+5:30, gabbydott wrote:
>
> Yes, the question is, can there be an overall ethics for all times, if 
> it had never existed before? Creating a bubble and living in this 
> bubble means you need to start reading Aesop's fables to your worms 
> for them to learn to act as you expect them to. What is your 
> experience? 
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:19 PM, andrew vecsey 
> <[email protected]<javascript:>> 
> wrote: 
> > Reading the post below sent a shudder down my spine. Hitler argued for 
> > euthanasia and got support from people who saw nothing wrong with that. 
> You 
> > can very easily argue that you are doing the handicapped persons or 
> unwanted 
> > fetuses who can be seen to be a drain to others more fortunate a favor 
> by 
> > taking away their life. You can argue that they are either suffering 
> > needlessly and not living a fulfilled life or will not be loved.  That 
> is 
> > really opening up a can of worms. In my way of looking at things, the 
> people 
> > who are a drain or those who are unloved are a challenge to those more 
> > fortunate ones to carry them and care for them. Without them we can 
> easily 
> > forget our humanity and become cold hearted people who put a price tag 
> on 
> > life. Life is something that is given to everyone alive and no one 
> should 
> > think that they have a right to take it away from anyone. 
> > 
> > On Tuesday, September 25, 2012 4:07:29 PM UTC+2, RP Singh wrote: 
> >> 
> >> Abortion is widely practiced and euthanasia is finding support from 
> >> some groups , ethics are changing with time. I see nothing wrong in 
> >> that. 
> >> 
> >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 6:23 PM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: 
> >> > Your definition could argue for abortion and euthanasia- is that what 
> >> > you intend? 
> >> > 
> >> > On Sep 23, 9:20 am, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: 
> >> >> Conscious beings are a proof of God because otherwise an unconscious 
> >> >> Being 
> >> >> could not be said to exist. Existence is the seed which finds its 
> >> >> growth in 
> >> >> life. 
> >> > 
> >> > -- 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > 
> > 
>

-- 



Reply via email to