On 18 Oct, 22:25, Vam <[email protected]> wrote: > It is WE - you and I each - who has need of ethics, so that we know how to > think, assess and act at situations we face and live through. > > I always clarifies through our interaction with others, its consequence, > untill we happen to obtain the social view. > > If you can live without ethics, try it ! Then let us know something real... > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 19, 2012 1:22:13 AM UTC+5:30, gabbydott wrote: > > > Yes, the question is, can there be an overall ethics for all times, if > > it had never existed before? Creating a bubble and living in this > > bubble means you need to start reading Aesop's fables to your worms > > for them to learn to act as you expect them to. What is your > > experience? > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:19 PM, andrew vecsey > > <[email protected]<javascript:>> > > wrote: > > > Reading the post below sent a shudder down my spine. Hitler argued for > > > euthanasia and got support from people who saw nothing wrong with that. > > You > > > can very easily argue that you are doing the handicapped persons or > > unwanted > > > fetuses who can be seen to be a drain to others more fortunate a favor > > by > > > taking away their life. You can argue that they are either suffering > > > needlessly and not living a fulfilled life or will not be loved. That > > is > > > really opening up a can of worms. In my way of looking at things, the > > people > > > who are a drain or those who are unloved are a challenge to those more > > > fortunate ones to carry them and care for them. Without them we can > > easily > > > forget our humanity and become cold hearted people who put a price tag > > on > > > life. Life is something that is given to everyone alive and no one > > should > > > think that they have a right to take it away from anyone. > > > > On Tuesday, September 25, 2012 4:07:29 PM UTC+2, RP Singh wrote: > > > >> Abortion is widely practiced and euthanasia is finding support from > > >> some groups , ethics are changing with time. I see nothing wrong in > > >> that. > > > >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 6:23 PM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > Your definition could argue for abortion and euthanasia- is that what > > >> > you intend? > > > >> > On Sep 23, 9:20 am, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> Conscious beings are a proof of God because otherwise an unconscious > > >> >> Being > > >> >> could not be said to exist. Existence is the seed which finds its > > >> >> growth in > > >> >> life. > > > >> > -- > > > > --
--
