Or in Allan's words: "we are all full of hot air and release it quickly.
that is part
of what make ME so good,"

2012/11/24 Molly <[email protected]>

> I have seen it used recently as an ineffective cover for a badly
> positioned provocative argument. "I was only kidding, she doesn't
> understand my humor..." not hard to see through and not inspiring
> confidence.  The dance of the fool.
>
> Kind humor, irony, absurd, surprise are more my style than sarcasm or
> more aggressive humor that derides or shames.
>
> There is no denying the biochemical rush that comes with laughing
> oneself to tears, and the joy that comes with sharing such a moment.
>
> On Nov 24, 1:51 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > While there is only speculation about how humor developed in early
> > humans, we know that by the 6th century BCE the Greeks had
> > institutionalized it in the ritual known as comedy, and that it was
> > performed with a contrasting dramatic form known as tragedy. Both were
> > based on the violation of mental patterns and expectations, and in
> > both the world is a tangle of conflicting systems where humans live in
> > the shadow of failure, folly, and death. Like tragedy, comedy
> > represents life as full of tension, danger, and struggle, with success
> > or failure often depending on chance factors. Where they differ is in
> > the responses of the lead characters to life's incongruities.
> > Identifying with these characters, audiences at comedies and tragedies
> > have contrasting responses to events in the dramas. And because these
> > responses carry over to similar situations in life, comedy and tragedy
> > embody contrasting responses to the incongruities in life.
> >
> > Tragedy valorizes serious, emotional engagement with life's problems,
> > even struggle to the death. Along with epic, it is part of the Western
> > heroic tradition that extols ideals, the willingness to fight for
> > them, and honor. The tragic ethos is linked to patriarchy and
> > militarism—many of its heroes are kings and conquerors—and it
> > valorizes what Conrad Hyers (1996) calls Warrior Virtues—blind
> > obedience, the willingness to kill or die on command, unquestioning
> > loyalty, single-mindedness, resoluteness of purpose, and pride.
> >
> > Comedy, by contrast, embodies an anti-heroic, pragmatic attitude
> > toward life's incongruities. From Aristophanes' Lysistrata to Charlie
> > Chaplin's The Great Dictator to Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11,
> > comedy has mocked the irrationality of militarism and blind respect
> > for authority. Its own methods of handling conflict include deal-
> > making, trickery, getting an enemy drunk, and running away. As the
> > Irish saying goes, you're only a coward for a moment, but you're dead
> > for the rest of your life. In place of Warrior Virtues, it extols
> > critical thinking, cleverness, adaptability, and an appreciation of
> > physical pleasures like eating, drinking, and sex.
> >
> > Much humour is cruel - but try and read cruelty in to 'Doctor, doctor,
> > I've lost an electron'.  'Are you sure'?  'Yes, I'm positive'.
> >
> > What do we think humour is?
>
> --
>
>
>
>

-- 



Reply via email to