Thinking more about this I have decided human behaviors are part of our animal camouflage (predator-prey). And body language is often unconscious reflexes that can be discerned- even those of a sociopath or psychopath.
On Dec 28, 12:22 pm, rigs <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe women read signals differently. :-) It could be that motherhood/ > wifedom trains them to anticipate. I'm pretty good at spotting a > phoney- even better in retrospect.//Maybe fear is the unlying motive > of a lie- starting in childhood.//We learn behaviors that give us > security in the family and groups- even negative behavior- as in > addictive personalities seeking relationships that are familiar to > deal with, etc.//My daughter is quite ill with a 104 temp (the flu) > and the last two days have been pretty hectic but she is coming round > and thankfully the grandchildren are very easy for me and have lots to > keep them busy and entertained. > > On Dec 27, 5:19 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I don't agree on the body language or behavioural cues rigs - all the > > tests done show we are about as reliable as the toss of a coin. The > > people who are best at making us think we can read them are > > psychopaths - three times more likely to secure parole from 'experts'. > > > On 27 Dec, 09:15, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Yes the rich have more opportunities and exposure to make more > > > wealth.. why would you say that is Rigsy?? Why are not these > > > opportunities and exposure created for the poor? .. they are the ones > > > that need it. or could it be part of the perks of worshiping at the > > > feet of the golden calf?? > > > Allan > > > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 2:49 AM, rigs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > It may be the rich have more opportunities and exposure, Allan. Human > > > > nature is human nature. Also, celebrity creates another kind of > > > > challenge as the artist types gain fame and fortune- often to laugh at > > > > their own popularity and adulation of the public and critics- Picasso > > > > comes to mind, for instance- have a savage quote of his around here > > > > somewhere. > > > > > On Dec 25, 8:04 am, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Oddly I think you have a better chance for good ethics among the poor > > > >> over the rich, > > > >> Allan > > > > >> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > I wonder if the researchers took into account that a truly ethical > > > >> > person > > > >> > would not participate in the kind of rubbish that presents > > > >> > predictable > > > >> > limited outcomes as fact. There may, indeed, be a correlation > > > >> > between > > > >> > creativity and ethics, but I suspect it is more inclusive and > > > >> > requires > > > >> > examination without the limits designed to define results. I keep > > > >> > going back > > > >> > to the model of spiral dynamics, one that allows and understands > > > >> > that we all > > > >> > move up and down and between memes during our lives given the > > > >> > circumstances > > > >> > of our experience. Someone who does not have enough money for food > > > >> > may > > > >> > cheat in this experiment more than someone who has never known > > > >> > financial > > > >> > stress or hunger. Here is a pretty good explanation of the original > > > >> > Graves > > > >> > material, although I've seen better, its the best I could find > > > >> > online this > > > >> > morning.http://www.edumar.cl/documentos/SD_version_for_constellation5.pdf > > > > >> > On Monday, December 24, 2012 5:58:21 PM UTC-5, archytas wrote: > > > > >> >> A free paper with the ideas is at > > > >> >>http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/11-064.pdf > > > >> >> I was interested because I find professional ethics and religious > > > >> >> morality collapse under circumstances of self-interest and become > > > >> >> rationalisation. WE need creative solutions - but there is a dark > > > >> >> side to creativity. > > > > >> >> On 24 Dec, 22:03, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> >> > "The (Honest) Truth About Dishonesty: How We Lie to Everyone — > > > >> >> > Especially Ourselves" by Dan Ariely asks a seemingly simple > > > >> >> > question — > > > >> >> > “is dishonesty largely restricted to a few bad apples, or is it a > > > >> >> > more > > > >> >> > widespread problem?” — and goes on to reveal the surprising, > > > >> >> > illuminating, often unsettling truths that underpin the > > > >> >> > uncomfortable > > > >> >> > answer. Like cruelty, dishonesty turns out to be a remarkably > > > >> >> > prevalent phenomenon better explained by circumstances and > > > >> >> > cognitive > > > >> >> > processes than by concepts like character. > > > > >> >> > Work like this is challenging traditional economics - the genre is > > > >> >> > 'behavioural economics'. My own take on this book and a lot of > > > >> >> > work > > > >> >> > from brain science and history is that we are at a tipping point > > > >> >> > in > > > >> >> > respect of the possibility of a human science. I'd like to see a > > > >> >> > broader literature take up this challenge beyond current drivel on > > > >> >> > black and white hats. > > > > >> >> > So what are you guys reading? > > > > >> > -- > > > > >> -- > > > >> ( > > > >> ) > > > >> |_D Allan > > > > >> Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living. > > > > >> Of course I talk to myself, > > > >> Sometimes I need expert advice..- Hide quoted text - > > > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > > > -- > > > > -- > > > ( > > > ) > > > |_D Allan > > > > Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living. > > > > Of course I talk to myself, > > > Sometimes I need expert advice..- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --
