Now that sounds more like you. :)
What you are describing or asking I now understand/interpret/hear in terms
of what I know about what they are trying to find out about "junk DNA". Its
purpose/function/added value. As for what you describe as another way, I
know/experience/see this in what the companies describe as "developing the
market". We are still on topic, aren't we?


2013/3/21 James <[email protected]>

> I have a feeling you are being charitable with me gabby (cringe). What you
> say makes sense, and should add that the intent I refer to is in excess of
> that needed for mere gene survival fitness. In that sense I consider the
> adaptations as simulations and the excess as breaking the barriers of
> meta-simulation, or in another way, not just running within time but
> operating on it by taking advantage of the rules and finding ways to bend
> them. Now it is my turn to ask, does that make sense [to anyone]?
>
>
> On 3/20/2013 3:01 AM, gabbydott wrote:
>
>> I don't know if this is good or bad, but i hear that you haven't just
>> heard about mirror neurons, that this is a relatively consciously made up
>> construct, a construct with intent or purpose. Also it sounds strange when
>> you say that this neurological mechanism is strange (to you). That's where
>> my "parallel mirror neurons" come into play, i compare what you say with
>> what i have heard you saying before and add the info as well as my
>> judgement on what you say to my internal "Virtualization" of you. The leap
>> is more of a constant exercise of differentiating between you and me while
>> operating on the virtualization of each participant, so to speak. Does that
>> somehow make sense to you?
>>
>> Of course, I could go back to the group website and search for the real
>> data on what you have been saying on neurological mechanisms. But this
>> would be a completely new project. I'd have to go back and construct a new
>> image with my knowledge of now.
>>
>> But since you are still alive and still communicating, I find it much
>> easier and more purposeful to keep on listening to what you say, to respond
>> to it, and to rely on you saying, if you disagree. Not a good position for
>> me to be in, more of a survival strategy. Now that's worth a leap into
>> rethinking mode. ;)
>>
>>
>> 2013/3/20 James <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>
>>
>>     My response was mostly a parallel narrative, my thinking on a
>>     personal level is when does a system of components transcend the
>>     boudaries of automata and begin to engage in the operations of
>>     intent. Where does gene fitness adaptation break loose into
>>     something perceiving, interacting, understanding and mastering? I
>>     have heard that our ability to reflect and interact on an intimate
>>     level arises from a strange neurological mechanism called mirror
>>     neurons. If this is something like the virtualization technologies
>>     we have been building in technology then with a bit more scale and
>>     pondering our science may make the leap logarithmically.
>>
>>
>>     On 3/18/2013 8:15 PM, James wrote:
>>
>>         I see this sometimes too Andrew, and we learn how our internal
>>         systems and culture drive and shape us, so we can create. We
>>         model from the simplest sensory stimuli on to reflections on
>>         the nature of our existence and what could be in a
>>         simultaneous simulation of reality. Our world can be full of
>>         intent, or I should say we experience it thus due to our
>>         capacity arising from our nature and drawing parables in the
>>         mist. It makes me wonder how many levels of abstraction,
>>         simulation and foresight are necessary to represent the human
>>         element. That minds like ours are derived from nature is
>>         astonishing and awe inspiring, that we reach so far and yet
>>         innocence is so fragile, the experience of awareness is far
>>         from today's science I think. Our synthetic counterparts or
>>         robots will have to wait.
>>
>>         On 3/13/2013 5:35 AM, andrew vecsey wrote:
>>
>>             Perhaps we are born into a world filled with negative
>>             aspects rather than positive aspects so as to give us a
>>             direction. We are born small so that we can grow. We are
>>             born ignorant so that we could know. We are born with
>>             negative aspects so that we could acquire positive ones.
>>
>>             On Monday, January 28, 2013 12:11:39 PM UTC+1, andrew
>>             vecsey wrote:
>>
>>                 Why do so many of us remember negative feelings easier
>>             than
>>                 positive ones. Pain over pleasure. Bad news over good
>>             news. Why
>>                 does "bad" overshadow "good", immorality over
>>             morality, despair
>>                 over hope, pessimism over optimism. Why does hate
>>             appear to be
>>                 more powerful than love? Why is greed louder than
>>             generosity. Why
>>                 is destruction of war so much faster than the building
>>             power of
>>                 peace. Why can one little lie destroy a lifetime of
>>             trust. Why are
>>                 lies more influential than truth. It all seems so one
>>             sided. Why
>>                 is that?
>>
>>             --
>>             ---
>>             You received this message because you are subscribed to
>>             the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
>>             To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
>>             from it, send an email to
>>             
>> minds-eye+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.com<minds-eye%[email protected]>
>>             
>> <mailto:minds-eye%**[email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]>
>> **>.
>>
>>             For more options, visit
>>             
>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>
>> .
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     --
>>     --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>     Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
>>     To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>     send an email to 
>> minds-eye+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.com<minds-eye%[email protected]>
>>     
>> <mailto:minds-eye%**[email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]>
>> **>.
>>
>>     For more options, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>
>> .
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> ""Minds Eye"" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to 
>> minds-eye+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.com<minds-eye%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>
>> .
>>
>>
>>
> --
>
> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to 
> minds-eye+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.com<minds-eye%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>
> .
>
>
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to