Whereas I doubt that the damage done can be ignored and suppressed any longer.
2014-09-19 22:09 GMT+02:00, Molly <[email protected]>: > But I have no doubt that these emotions will be tempered by an > understanding of the feelings of others. > > On Friday, September 19, 2014 1:31:10 PM UTC-4, Gabby wrote: >> >> Hahaha, God save the Queen. :) >> >> Am Freitag, 19. September 2014 schrieb Molly : >> >>> Picking on each other seems irresistible at times. It is no substitute >>> for dialogue. Not sure what purpose it serves. Maybe none. Maybe some >>> kind >>> of personal satisfaction. I try to stay out of it. Life goes on. >>> >>> On Friday, September 19, 2014 10:05:30 AM UTC-4, Allan Heretic wrote: >>>> >>>> Molly and Neil do an excellent job as moderators. I would like to give >>>> both of them a long heartfelt ovation for putting up with the likes of >>>> me >>>> and you Gabby. >>>> Thank you Molly & Neil for a job well done. >>>> >>>> Allan >>>> Living Soul >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Gabby Thiede <[email protected]> >>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 3:57 PM >>>> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: "A wise man once said." >>>> >>>> I would prefer you excised your moderation job in a more unartistic, >>>> less biased way and took your responsibility as group owner more >>>> serious. >>>> But it seems this is only my preference. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 19.09.2014 um 15:37 schrieb Molly <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> art that is beautiful, art meant to disturb, art that pushes the >>>> technical limits previously established, art constructed not to last >>>> like >>>> chalk on sidewalks or sand sculptures on beaches - art comes in many >>>> forms >>>> and can be as simple as a concept in Haiku or complicated as Mt. >>>> Rushmore. >>>> This age old question, will it always be asked and answered? It does >>>> provide a platform for good dialogue and self exploration. >>>> >>>> On Thursday, September 18, 2014 9:05:40 AM UTC-4, archytas wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I agree Facil - though some definition of artist is required. What is >>>>> >>>>> this 'art' not part of 1000 channels with nothing on except the >>>>> simulacrum >>>>> of drivel, generally funded by advertising? I might point to Maxwell >>>>> (perhaps both the great scientist and my dog) and Einstein. I've long >>>>> >>>>> wondered about art and people-community development - I'm floored by >>>>> people >>>>> using dance to work with disabled kids (as an example). Brian Bevan >>>>> (rugby >>>>> leaugue's record try scorer) was a work of art in action. Gabby might >>>>> be >>>>> see as such in another form of side-step. Not all art brings much >>>>> reward. >>>>> Allan and Andrew have a go, sometimes not at each other. Molly has >>>>> often >>>>> touched me deeply, even if so much of my experience has been 'dark >>>>> side'. >>>>> The chocolate box picture isn't art unless a child is smiling. >>>>> >>>>> Art may have some function in revealing such as 'change is the same >>>>> thing' and the depravity of political words, the 'lie that tells us the >>>>> >>>>> truth' sort of stuff - but does the 'pipe' have to be painted by >>>>> Magritte? >>>>> One confronts this picture doing systems analysis - modelling the >>>>> reality >>>>> is not modelling the rhetoric. >>>>> >>>>> On Thursday, 18 September 2014 00:31:17 UTC+1, facilitator wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't think artists do, otherwise the term "starving artist" would >>>>>> be applied less frequently. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 9:54:57 AM UTC-4, archytas wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ms Tidulz says she has no gold and just looks at her claws when I >>>>>>> suggest she should be replaced with a golden goose. Perhaps one >>>>>>> needs a >>>>>>> heretic cat? Do artists have some knack in spotting the drivel we >>>>>>> 'all' >>>>>>> want? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>> >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >>>> Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ >>>> topic/minds-eye/JaQa8KNDeo0/unsubscribe. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >>>> [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> -- >>> >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >>> Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/minds-eye/JaQa8KNDeo0/unsubscribe. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/minds-eye/JaQa8KNDeo0/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
