Here on the internet the farming and harvesting obeys different interdependencies than saw in springtime and harvest at fall. When I say I need to say something on the big brother issue before, I mean I need to get back to the big brother issue first. Thank you for your understanding. Am 23.12.2014 11:27 schrieb "archytas" <[email protected]>:
> To be honest Gabby, I feel lost, though not on big brother assumptions. I > can understand and take part in Occupy - merely surprised here that we > aren't taking the streets en masse. I could protest kids staying at home > 'forever', not having decent earnings, homes and so on - but can hardly > see EDL, UKIP and various similar across the EU as protests I can join. > The same is true for me on various black protests basing themselves around > police shootings. I don't see the latter as right or excusable > (considerable incompetence is usually involved), I do see the > discrimination generally, but the focus into race seems wrong, to include a > romanticist notion of those shot and a lot of false positive and negative > notions on what we can expect from police officers - though I think the > wider justice system is shot through with injustice. I know what big > brother can do when unleashed - most recently here in Northern Ireland. > Yet there remain important questions about 'violence from the other side'. > I protested with a million others against the Iraq War, though we had as > little effect as the same number of Germans who turned out in Berlin before > WW1. We seem as far from democracy as ever and unable to find protest > against what matters to me, and a lot of what is happening scares me as > opening the door to fascism whether black or white - the bent promises of > great leaders. > > You'll have to say what you mean on big brother assumptions. I've seen > the kind of files that are kept and what various agencies do when > complained about from petty town halls to those who can cover up through > Public Inquiries. This has gone on since Byzantine days. My assumption is > it is dreadful and operated by people I wouldn't trust to issue dog > licences. > > On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 08:13:09 UTC, Gabby wrote: >> >> Okay, I get what you are saying. Now, what exactly are your questions? I >> still need to say something on your big brother assumptions, so it would be >> helpful if you could specify your fields of interest in the meantime here. >> Thank you. > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/minds-eye/miZGbYDNUP4/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
