There are many forms of logic, all with flaws. We have forgotten a lot about the role of religions in how strangers should be treated. Logics turn out less rational than we tend to think of them. There is probably a logic of tolerance, that makes claims of certainty from logic untenable.
On Saturday, February 21, 2015 at 7:21:58 PM UTC, Allan Heretic wrote: > > It is a hindu thing and using hindu logic.. I can follow it to a point > then the logical steps become illogical to me. But I am thinking, > considering the options.. > > > Being american I tend to forget that transendentalism is an american > thing. I would suggest looking it up in wikipedia they give a much better > explaination than I can > > تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين > Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others > > -----Original Message----- > From: gabbydott <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 2:29 PM > Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: The religious atheist > > The One but the many, the many but the One - does not sound convincing in > my ears. Allan, what do you say? > > Am Samstag, 21. Februar 2015 schrieb RP Singh <[email protected]>: > >> Gabby , the logic is that One is behind the many , but not the many. The >> individual is just a fragment or rather an emanation of the One , but not >> the One. It is the One which is the repository of all knowledge where the >> infinite beings , the limitless creation, is unmanifest and become manifest >> when their time comes. Theoretically as all that has been or will be is >> there in the unmanifest any thing in the past or anything in the future can >> be known by touching that source. The past, present or the future is all >> history as it always exists in the One. >> >> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 4:03 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hey, your spell checker is doing a good job, Allan! :) Thanks. >>> >>> The compass needle is in balance. Back in balance. As this seems to be >>> your orientational pattern: "bring back information from the totality of >>> all knowledge". God being the representative of the "all knowledge" and >>> therefore greater than the individual knowledge. Did I get that right so >>> far? What leaves me wondering is, how does that understanding match with >>> the One&theMany understanding, which would not really draw the line between >>> the individual and the All, but see the different perspectives as the cause >>> for you seeing God as being greater. Or let me ask differently, how much >>> would you say is the soul the individual representative of the totality of >>> all knowledge? And in how much is the soul equipped with its own compass >>> needle from there? >>> >>> Am Samstag, 21. Februar 2015 schrieb : >>> >>>> Was thinking about the old testament. Whati don't like about it is the >>>> inaccurate descriptions. Or outright lies but what van you expect from a >>>> group of people trying to put themselves above the rest of humanity. I can >>>> relate to some of what is recorded because similar things have occurred to >>>> me, which leaves me wondering what really went on. >>>> >>>> The story of creation is fasinating especially if you pitch thr time >>>> scale and look it as stages.. In its own right it ts a simplified >>>> version >>>> of the big bsng theory told to a group of herders/hunter gathers >>>> explaining >>>> their origin.. Similar in aspects to the stories of how the navajo emerhed >>>> on this earth. Both are amazingly accurate. Personally in my views I tend >>>> to be a transendentlist believing that one can actually cross the >>>> time/space barrier to bring back information from the totality of all >>>> knowledge (which is ever expanding and not stagnant) because of my >>>> understanding of a being greater than myself which I commonly refer to as >>>> God. This being helps me retrieve new information in a format you can >>>> understand. To me there is a totality of knowledge all contained with a >>>> being I refer to as God. >>>> >>>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين >>>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >>>> Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/minds-eye/yDzn3Mhp_8I/unsubscribe. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >>>> [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> -- >>> >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >> Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/minds-eye/yDzn3Mhp_8I/unsubscribe. >> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > ""Minds Eye"" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
