It is a hindu thing and using hindu logic.. I can follow it to a point then the logical steps become illogical to me. But I am thinking, considering the options..
Being american I tend to forget that transendentalism is an american thing. I would suggest looking it up in wikipedia they give a much better explaination than I can تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others -----Original Message----- From: gabbydott <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 2:29 PM Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: The religious atheist The One but the many, the many but the One - does not sound convincing in my ears. Allan, what do you say? Am Samstag, 21. Februar 2015 schrieb RP Singh <[email protected]>: > Gabby , the logic is that One is behind the many , but not the many. The > individual is just a fragment or rather an emanation of the One , but not > the One. It is the One which is the repository of all knowledge where the > infinite beings , the limitless creation, is unmanifest and become manifest > when their time comes. Theoretically as all that has been or will be is > there in the unmanifest any thing in the past or anything in the future can > be known by touching that source. The past, present or the future is all > history as it always exists in the One. > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 4:03 PM, gabbydott <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> Hey, your spell checker is doing a good job, Allan! :) Thanks. >> >> The compass needle is in balance. Back in balance. As this seems to be >> your orientational pattern: "bring back information from the totality of >> all knowledge". God being the representative of the "all knowledge" and >> therefore greater than the individual knowledge. Did I get that right so >> far? What leaves me wondering is, how does that understanding match with >> the One&theMany understanding, which would not really draw the line between >> the individual and the All, but see the different perspectives as the cause >> for you seeing God as being greater. Or let me ask differently, how much >> would you say is the soul the individual representative of the totality of >> all knowledge? And in how much is the soul equipped with its own compass >> needle from there? >> >> Am Samstag, 21. Februar 2015 schrieb : >> >>> Was thinking about the old testament. Whati don't like about it is the >>> inaccurate descriptions. Or outright lies but what van you expect from a >>> group of people trying to put themselves above the rest of humanity. I can >>> relate to some of what is recorded because similar things have occurred to >>> me, which leaves me wondering what really went on. >>> >>> The story of creation is fasinating especially if you pitch thr time >>> scale and look it as stages.. In its own right it ts a simplified version >>> of the big bsng theory told to a group of herders/hunter gathers explaining >>> their origin.. Similar in aspects to the stories of how the navajo emerhed >>> on this earth. Both are amazingly accurate. Personally in my views I tend >>> to be a transendentlist believing that one can actually cross the >>> time/space barrier to bring back information from the totality of all >>> knowledge (which is ever expanding and not stagnant) because of my >>> understanding of a being greater than myself which I commonly refer to as >>> God. This being helps me retrieve new information in a format you can >>> understand. To me there is a totality of knowledge all contained with a >>> being I refer to as God. >>> >>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين >>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others >>> >>> -- >>> >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >>> Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/minds-eye/yDzn3Mhp_8I/unsubscribe. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> -- >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> ""Minds Eye"" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','minds-eye%[email protected]');> >> . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/minds-eye/yDzn3Mhp_8I/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','minds-eye%[email protected]');> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
