Happy to sell tickets. Show might be a long yawn. If you are testifying on corruption, your show might be just as long, Neil.
On Monday, March 23, 2015 at 7:01:27 PM UTC-4, archytas wrote: > > No need for Snoopy here - a Maxwell and the sage Zak are on hand under cat > command. Who was rude to Molly and why didn't I get tickets? If you are > waiting for the train the advice to stick between the tracks (as in waiting > for the 8.31 am as I do most mornings) is clearly malevolent. > > On Monday, March 23, 2015 at 10:08:58 PM UTC, Molly wrote: > > Not sure what just happened. Bill Hicks used to say that we let our demons > run amok. No shortage of that in here. An adult conversation with Charlie > Brown would have to include Snoopy. And the Red Barron. Now we are back to > flights between the Netherlands and Detroit. > > On Sunday, March 22, 2015 at 6:04:37 AM UTC-4, Allan Heretic wrote: > > I did not read Neil saying you were rude to Molly.. > But did read he was headed off for an adult conversation with Charlie > Brown. > > تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين > Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others > > -----Original Message----- > From: RP Singh <[email protected]> > To: Minds Eye <[email protected]> > Sent: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 10:26 AM > Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Einstein and the Mystics > > Where have I been rude to Molly can anyone tell me, it was just a clash of > viewpoints and in discussions you have to come out strongly which both of > us did. If there was sarcasm it was from both sides, and in discussions in > the modern world chivalry won't do. This is an online conversation and most > of the time you don't even realize that you are talking to a lady. So, > Neil, will you point out to me where I was rude? > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 1:02 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well, now we know Molly is just regressing to a foetal state on the > 'basis' on 9 LSD case studies, we can safely dismiss mysticism and become > slaves of RP's non-mystic unconscious god, naively suffering misery and > euphoria concerning achievements not ours. This is science but not as we > know it Jim. > > I'm off for an adult conversation with Charlie Brown. Doesn't Lucy do > some character assassination psychoanalysis? The mystic bit is not in the > bickering. It would concern the superordinate, not dropping concrete block > absolutes as the only answer to everything.. > > > On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 6:37:11 PM UTC, Allan Heretic wrote: > > RP even your Hindu say there is a soul. You are saying it does not exist. > Which is right? > I know I have a soul it is not a best guess as your statements are. I know > God is real far beyond best guess.. Your reality is nothing more than best > guess of what you think you have seen. > Do you know what I have experienced to the point you can exclude my > experiences as invalid dismissing them with the wave of your hand claiming > superior knowledge, which to me is little more than a guess. > I can understand your point of view and how you arrived at your conclusion > including why you feel they are valid.. From your perspective they are > valid. > > The problem is you are only in possessions of partial perspective. Now the > real question is can you truly understand the perspective of others. > Fortunately your perspective does not effect my soul or the souls of > others. Each soul is responsible for only it's perspective. It is a matter > of free will. Sorry but I did not forget that to you free will does not > exist. Sadly apparently you have already made your choice. > > تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين > Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others > > -----Original Message----- > From: RP Singh <[email protected]> > To: Minds Eye <[email protected]> > Sent: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 6:25 PM > Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Einstein and the Mystics > > Man easily accepts what is appealing and that is why people believe in an > after-life. It is the survival instinct that stops us from accepting what > is evident and obvious. Death is certain yet we escape it by taking on the > non-dual perspective, but we are far from the non-dual and always in > duality. It is not the case of one Molly but thousands of others talking > about all-in-one and one-in-all and a non-dual perspective. I don't think > that they even have an idea of what is non-dual, taking an experience of > awareness to be the absolute state. > My view might be disturbing because death is certainly so, but you cannot > escape it by imagining to be the non-dual. We are always responsible > people, yet we are fettered by bonds not recognizable as such, and so the > arrogance and depression. Truth remains what it is and yet we find it > painful, so what else but spirituality to cloak it in just to have a > delusion of immortality. > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:03 PM, archytas < > > ... -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
