On 2011.09.21 07:51, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > Hmm, do the following fix your case? > > Kai? > > --- _timeval.h~ 2010-05-26 20:21:09.000000000 +0300 > +++ _timeval.h 2011-09-21 09:48:42.000000000 +0300 > @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ struct timeval > #define timerisset(tvp) ((tvp)->tv_sec || (tvp)->tv_usec) > #define timercmp(tvp,uvp,cmp) \ > ((tvp)->tv_sec cmp (uvp)->tv_sec || \ > - (tvp)->tv_sec == (uvp)->tv_sec&& (tvp)->tv_usec cmp > (uvp)->tv_usec) > + ((tvp)->tv_sec == (uvp)->tv_sec&& (tvp)->tv_usec cmp > (uvp)->tv_usec)) > #define timerclear(tvp) (tvp)->tv_sec = (tvp)->tv_usec = 0 > > #endif /* _TIMEVAL_DEFINED */
Hi Kai, Yes it does. Thanks for looking into it. /Pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
