2011/9/21 Pete Batard <[email protected]>: > On 2011.09.21 07:51, Ozkan Sezer wrote: >> Hmm, do the following fix your case? >> >> Kai? >> >> --- _timeval.h~ 2010-05-26 20:21:09.000000000 +0300 >> +++ _timeval.h 2011-09-21 09:48:42.000000000 +0300 >> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ struct timeval >> #define timerisset(tvp) ((tvp)->tv_sec || (tvp)->tv_usec) >> #define timercmp(tvp,uvp,cmp) \ >> ((tvp)->tv_sec cmp (uvp)->tv_sec || \ >> - (tvp)->tv_sec == (uvp)->tv_sec&& (tvp)->tv_usec cmp >> (uvp)->tv_usec) >> + ((tvp)->tv_sec == (uvp)->tv_sec&& (tvp)->tv_usec cmp >> (uvp)->tv_usec)) >> #define timerclear(tvp) (tvp)->tv_sec = (tvp)->tv_usec = 0 >> >> #endif /* _TIMEVAL_DEFINED */ > > Hi Kai, > > Yes it does. Thanks for looking into it. > > /Pete
Oh, we missed a open-brace. Patch is ok for trunk and all branches. Thanks for spotting this. Kai ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
