On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Kai Tietz <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2011/9/21 Pete Batard <[email protected]>:
>> On 2011.09.21 07:51, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>>> Hmm, do the following fix your case?
>>>
>>> Kai?
>>>
>>> --- _timeval.h~       2010-05-26 20:21:09.000000000 +0300
>>> +++ _timeval.h        2011-09-21 09:48:42.000000000 +0300
>>> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ struct timeval
>>>   #define timerisset(tvp)             ((tvp)->tv_sec || (tvp)->tv_usec)
>>>   #define timercmp(tvp,uvp,cmp)                                       \
>>>               ((tvp)->tv_sec cmp (uvp)->tv_sec ||             \
>>> -              (tvp)->tv_sec == (uvp)->tv_sec&&  (tvp)->tv_usec cmp 
>>> (uvp)->tv_usec)
>>> +              ((tvp)->tv_sec == (uvp)->tv_sec&&  (tvp)->tv_usec cmp 
>>> (uvp)->tv_usec))
>>>   #define timerclear(tvp)             (tvp)->tv_sec = (tvp)->tv_usec = 0
>>>
>>>   #endif /* _TIMEVAL_DEFINED */
>>
>> Hi Kai,
>>
>> Yes it does. Thanks for looking into it.
>>
>> /Pete
>
> Oh, we missed a open-brace.  Patch is ok for trunk and all branches.
>
> Thanks for spotting this.
> Kai
>

Fixed in the trunk (r4485), in the v1.0 branch (r4486) and in the v2.0
branch (r4487.)

--
O.S.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to