> I vote for this. Boost can always be fixed, and it contains lots of > ugly hacks around various platform obscurities. I think MSVC > intrinsics combined with GCC are a valid obscurity. > Granted, if Boost is to change, you might as well give them the best > performance while we're at it :)
It's (apparently) a pretty trivial change and one that people are already recommending. Doesn't seem that significant an issue (to me). > Why not explain it to the Boost mailing list? I'm rather sure they'd > be inclined to accomodate us, if there's no fundamental problems with > the changes. While I could write the email, I'm not sure they'd listen to me. It's not like they know who I am. Also, I've been told that my posts are sometimes perceived as confrontational. And that's not a good thing for this kind of effort. dw ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
