On 10/13/2013 11:19, LRN wrote: > On 13.10.2013 07:05, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >> On 2013-10-12 21:53, LRN wrote: >>> I did make a native x86_64 toolchain back in the day, so i can do it. >>> But none of the projects that i'm working with actually requires 64-bit >>> code (and libgcrypt, for example, explicitly stated that it is not fit >>> to be used on 64-bit W32 just yet), > >> FYI, x86_64 patches for libgcrypt are available from Fedora: > >> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/mingw-libgcrypt.git/tree > Great, now just convince WK that they are secure and correct, and get > them committed upstream! :)
Oh boy, drama time. iirc it was refused on grounds that there is no need for a 64bit libgcrypt, hence the separated code base. Hopefully I just misremembered.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
