2013/12/24 Óscar Fuentes <[email protected]>
> Ivan Garramona
> <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > I think Clang svn uses its integrated assembler.
>
> IIRC Clang uses the integrated assembler since a few releases ago.
>
> > But it still needs GCC for linking though.
>
> On Windows, Clang needs MinGW or VS for linking and for the runtime
> libraries and headers (SDK, standard C/C++ library, process
> initialization, etc.)
>
> Support for VS is pretty bleak and Clang/VS is useless as a C++
> compiler. Support for MinGW is more mature (not production ready,
> although it creates usable executables on most cases) but for some
> reason people are ignoring it and all the hard work goes to VS
> compatibility.
>
Clang+MinGW-w64 is working pretty well for me. I've compiled Clang with it
self a few times (i think that's called boostrap right?), and didn't have
any problem. I'm even planning to move my projects from the buggy VC++ 2013
to Clang.
But yeah, it would be great to see more support to MinGW.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
