Óscar Fuentes 2013-12-25 00:51: > In my projects, programs compiled with Clang (since 3.2) run about 5% > faster than with g++ (4.8.1). That's on Linux x86_64. My tests indicate the opposite.
> Diagnostics are much better than any other C++ compiler, What are you talking? > Standards compliance is second to none What are you talking? > great stability... Why you argue about the compiler which only some few years and which is used in approximately 2% of open source projects? =) I think about three-five years it will be possible to talk about a certain stability Clang. The fact that I also was doing research in order to understand whether it makes sense to use Clang щк тще. And my answer is - no, there is no sense to use it. Maybe after a few years... -- Regards, niXman ___________________________________________________ Dual-target(32 & 64-bit) MinGW-W64 compilers for 32 and 64-bit Windows: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/ ___________________________________________________ Another online IDE: http://liveworkspace.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
