niXman <[email protected]> writes: > Ivan Garramona 2013-12-25 00:19: >> I'm even planning to move my projects from the buggy VC++ 2013 >> to Clang. > Why Clang? Why not GCC/MinGW-W64? > > As far as I know, Clang optimizes much worse than GCC.
In my projects, programs compiled with Clang (since 3.2) run about 5% faster than with g++ (4.8.1). That's on Linux x86_64. > Small plus Clang > in that it compiles a little bit faster than GCC. It is *much* faster. For my C++ template-intensive code a Clang build completes in half the time (again, Linux x86_64). For Windows, Clang usually takes half the time as MinGW-W64 (4.8.2, x86). It is quite faster than MSVC++ 2013. > I really do not understand the fuss about Clang =) Diagnostics are much better than any other C++ compiler, Standards compliance is second to none, development is strong, great stability... And then there is libClang, but that's another kind of beast. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
