Ivan Garramona <[email protected]> writes: > Clang+MinGW-w64 is working pretty well for me.
For me the inability of creating C++ DLLs (exporting classes and template instantiations) is a show stopper. I had problems with some Boost libraries (boost::thread, IIRC) but that could be fixable. I'm glad that it works for you, though :-) I've compiled Clang with it > self a few times (i think that's called boostrap right?), and didn't have > any problem. I'm even planning to move my projects from the buggy VC++ 2013 > to Clang. If everything goes well, I'll replace MSVC with MinGW-W64 :-) > But yeah, it would be great to see more support to MinGW. I'll love to have Clang on Windows, though, but I don't see it happening anytime soon. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
