Hi Kai, On 04/01/15 12:11, Kai Tietz wrote: > Right, this isn't the first time we have this discussion. And I am in > hope it won't be the last time, as things need to change over time, or > need at least to be re-thought.
I do agree that we don't need to complicate development ATM. Current development model seems fine to me. Master branch is mostly stable (well, it could be better, but it's already way better than in the past and it's good enough now, IMO). It's also flexible enough so that we may change release model without changing other aspects of development, like staging branches. Being a small developer team may be a good thing. Changing things is easy, so we may just try new things like 'light' release without changing development model or even planning if the next release will be the same. We may reevaluate things based on how things work out once we try. Another 2 cents from me, Jacek ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
