On Friday 03 July 2026 09:24:56 Martin Storsjö wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jul 2026, Pali Rohár wrote:
> 
> > On Friday 03 July 2026 01:00:15 Martin Storsjö wrote:
> > > On Sun, 28 Jun 2026, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Evgeny, you bring this issue for arm64 and I have prepared a fix which
> > > > is in the attachment of the previous email. Could you please check and
> > > > test it? I really need feeback from your configuration / setup of
> > > > toolchain to know if it address your issue. Because I do not have it.
> > > > 
> > > > Martin, if you have a time, could you do (code) review for first two
> > > > changes which are for amd64 (which is rewriting / replacing the
> > > > __mingw_init_ehandler implementation)?
> > > 
> > > Those patches feel like super overkill.
> > > 
> > > I don't think we should have code to construct SEH unwind code by hand 
> > > here.
> > > I really can't see why we should need to do that.
> > 
> > For example, it is needed for C signal handlers.
> 
> Were C signal handlers working for a non-SEH build on x86_64 before your
> patches? If yes, then fix it by making it work like it did before. If not,
> then we don't need to fix it.

It did not work, that is why I prepared those fixes. And SIGFPE did not
work neither for SEH builds, that was the point of my changes, with tests.


_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to