> > I'm looking for a NAT/firewall/VPN solution with failover for a
> private enterprise TV system.  While my gut reaction is PF, I'm
> wondering if anybody here has done this before.
> 
> I might start a capabilities war, but we've seen OpenBSD become CPU
> bound with about 150k packets per second with some pretty fast hardware.
> This is without PF running.  I'm sure there are a million tweaks that
> can be done to improve this, but expecting OpenBSD + PF to process small
> packets (lets say 128 byte packets on average), resulting in 1 million
> packets per second on a "full" 1Gbps connection, is probably not going
> to happen.

Are you running -current? There have been some massive tweaks in 
networking performance in -current. Try out and report back.

Reply via email to