If you are Going to use linux as your dom0 I STRONGLY recommend against virtual box. Vb is the retarded stillborn twin of kvm. Kvm is twice as fast in mainline and not controlled by oracle
sent from android handset. Please mind the brevity. On Sep 20, 2011 12:44 AM, "Nico Kadel-Garcia" <nka...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 6:17 AM, lancebaynes87 <lancebayne...@zoho.com> wrote: >> http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/20917/are-there-any-virtualization-solutions-for-openbsd-important-no-package-from >> >> I'm searching for Virtualization solutions: >> >> OpenBSD: host >> CentOS: guest >> >> What are my solutions? I'm searching for one that doesn't use packages from ports. Are there any? >> >> Thank you in anticipation. > > Do it the other way around. RHEL, CentOS, and Scientific Linux 6.x all > work well with the "VirtualBox" and other virtualization servers, > though VirtualBox has the best interface for freeware. And OpenBSD > runs quite happily in virtualization. I use it for testing OpenBSD > tools in a primarily RHEL environment, and even use VirtualBox for > easy virtualization in places where I'm only handed a Windows desktop > or laptop. > > You don't get the same vaunted OS security or kernel performance on > the serverr, but you do get access to other familiar tools and layouts > that may not be available in OpenBSD yet. (I do note the availability > of recent tools I care about in 4.9, such as httpd-2.x and > libreoffice-3.x and subversion-1.6.x. Good!!!!)
