On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 09:55:56AM +0000, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > When you required rDNS I bet false positives went up by a factor of > 1000.
No, legitimate traffic remained steady and not a single complaint was registered. YMMV. Back on topic, in my personal experience, spamd is more effective than the Spamhaus zen or sbl-xbl lists by a good margin (remember not to use both, as the former contains the latter). Also it seems that the gulf is widening, making spamd even more valuable than before. But everyone's traffic is different. Nicolai
