!-- On Sat 17.Aug'13 at 14:10:43 BST, Otto Moerbeek (o...@drijf.net), wrote:
> Easiest way is to look at thge timestamps. They should be at least > mid-August. Thanks, got that. It's not the first time I've been told that. Stuart Henderson told me that before but I forgot so that's my fault again. > X will/should work if you have an up-to-date snap. But note radeon > support has been completely overhauled to include drm in about the > same timeframe. This is my main concern. The Aug 12 snapshot was an up-to-date snapshot and X tried to start but core dumped each time. Leading me to believe it won't work on my system. Of course it could have been related to the fact I hadn't got my packages up to date at that point because my WM is fvwm2 which is a package and may not have been able to be used on the t32 X stuff. In fact, the fvwm2.core files support that. > To check, use the same rule as above; not all snaps are (fully) > uploaded yet. And it takes time for them to propagate to the mirrors. > amd64 X has arrived on ftp.openbsd.org, so mirrors should have it > soonish. Got that. I will leave it for a week and check again. Thank you. > 64-bit time_t systems support the same hardware as before. > -Otto Thanks Otto. I appreciate you taking the time to reply and clarify those points for me. Best wishes, Jamie. -- James Griffin: jmz at kontrol.kode5.net A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38
