On Jun 10, 2015, at 3:59 PM, Okan Demirmen wrote: > On Wed 2015.06.10 at 15:43 -0500, Edgar Pettijohn III wrote: >> I've been using spamd for a while now. I was looking through my pf.conf and >> noticed that I had the following rules in regards to spamd. >> >> table <spamd-white> persist >> table <nospamd> persist file "/etc/mail/nospamd" >> pass in log on egress proto tcp from any to any port smtp \ >> rdr-to 127.0.0.1 port spamd >> pass in on egress proto tcp from <nospamd> to any port smtp >> pass in on egress proto tcp from <spamd-white> to any port smtp >> pass out log on egress proto tcp to any port smtp >> >> Everything seems to work correctly, but I was thinking the rdr-to rule was >> wrong so I looked at spamd(8) and it shows a divert-to rule instead. When I >> change it to divert-to I get the following error: >> >> # pfctl -vf /etc/pf.conf >> >> /etc/pf.conf:19: address family mismatch for divert >> pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not loaded >> >> What should I do to fix this. Is the rdr-to rule sufficient or do I need to >> change it? > > Depends. 5.7 and prior used rdr-to; and -current switched to divert-to. > > http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20150518 > > Thanks
I guess I missed that line. However, I think my system is out of whack. I upgraded to 5.7, but the spamd man page is from 5.6. Thanks for the lead. Edgar
