As Okan stated, your 5.6 man page is still correct for 5.7. It is only of issue when you move to 5.8-Release in November.
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man5/pf.conf.5?query=pf%2econf <- -current and 5.8, use/will use divert-to (Can't give you a link to the online pf.conf man page for 5.7 as it hasn't been snapped for 5.7-release) My man pages on my 5.7 hosts specify rdr-to Cheers, Jason. On 11 June 2015 at 11:51, Edgar Pettijohn III <ed...@pettijohn-web.com> wrote: > On Jun 10, 2015, at 3:59 PM, Okan Demirmen wrote: > >> On Wed 2015.06.10 at 15:43 -0500, Edgar Pettijohn III wrote: >>> I've been using spamd for a while now. I was looking through my pf.conf >>> and noticed that I had the following rules in regards to spamd. >>> >>> table <spamd-white> persist >>> table <nospamd> persist file "/etc/mail/nospamd" >>> pass in log on egress proto tcp from any to any port smtp \ >>> rdr-to 127.0.0.1 port spamd >>> pass in on egress proto tcp from <nospamd> to any port smtp >>> pass in on egress proto tcp from <spamd-white> to any port smtp >>> pass out log on egress proto tcp to any port smtp >>> >>> Everything seems to work correctly, but I was thinking the rdr-to rule was >>> wrong so I looked at spamd(8) and it shows a divert-to rule instead. When >>> I change it to divert-to I get the following error: >>> >>> # pfctl -vf /etc/pf.conf >>> >>> /etc/pf.conf:19: address family mismatch for divert >>> pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not loaded >>> >>> What should I do to fix this. Is the rdr-to rule sufficient or do I need >>> to change it? >> >> Depends. 5.7 and prior used rdr-to; and -current switched to divert-to. >> >> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20150518 >> >> Thanks > > I guess I missed that line. However, I think my system is out of whack. I > upgraded to 5.7, but the spamd man page is from 5.6. Thanks for the lead. > > Edgar > > -- "If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88MPH, you're gonna to see some serious shit" - Emmett "Doc" Brown