http://s4.postimg.org/5ov9malvh/back.jpg http://s1.postimg.org/qqiiqvfi7/front.jpg
wait for it. <With a mini pci e module you can fiber optic the thingy.> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Mihai Popescu <mih...@gmail.com> wrote: > > But his point is still valid. > > Yes? APU1x is old and tested, so I can bet that benchmarks are readily > available. It is over-popular already, full of examples and tests. The > user was interested in APU2x wich is totally different. > > > He knew he had an inferior machine but it was still able to saturate a > 150Mb/s line. > > Where is your logic? Inferior looking at what? How much is 150Mb/s? > > > These requests for 'Real World' numbers are almost always stupid, > > No! Those are the real ones, the rest are just numbers. > > because the people asking are almost certain to never need the max > amount of bandwidth even a modest machine can supply. > > Wrong again. The market is full of applications demading power and > power. Look in the browser world! > > > Really? Are you actually considering this box for use at the > telecommunications provider you work for? > > You have no idea how many boxes like that are deployed in the > production environments. > My provider is offering 1Gb/sec in its own ISP network, at my door for > aprox. 10 euro/month. That is 1ooo Mb/sec and it can be reach most of > the time. So , do I really need a box to handle that? And this is home > install. > > -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\
