On 03:20 Fri 12 Aug, Anthony J. Bentley wrote: > Roderick writes: > > I know, you will complain, because I mention here that I still use > > OpenBSD 4.8 in a machine. > > Then why do you ask? Do you think people will happily take time to > help you debug problems on a system that has been *explicitly* > unsupported for the past five years? > > > In file included from /usr/include/machine/endian.h:58, > > from ../include/compat/machine/endian.h:36, > > from rc4/rc4_enc.c:59: > > /usr/include/sys/endian.h:162: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or > > '__attribute__' before 'htobe64' > > /usr/include/sys/endian.h:163: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or > > '__attribute__' before 'htobe32' > > /usr/include/sys/endian.h:164: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or > > '__attribute__' before 'htobe16' > > /usr/include/sys/endian.h: > > << > > > > What did change here from OpenBSD 4.8 to the current versions? Is it an > > esential change? > > Did you look at the CVS history? Obviously not, or you would have seen > right away that there have been *essential* changes to endian.h over the > course of the last five years. > > Or what, do you think that guenther's commits to our headers are meant > to make them worse?
Oh, looky, OpenBSD butthurt again.
