Same problem with a Canon LiDE 200. On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:03:53AM -0700, Base Pr1me wrote: > Did you give your userland user/group permissions to use the uhub/ugen > device?
I even ran the programs as root. > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Anthony J. Bentley <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Bryan Linton writes: > > > Hello misc@ > > > > > > I'm currently looking to purchase a scanner that works well with OpenBSD. > > > > > > I'm aware of the list provided at: > > > > > > http://www.sane-project.org/sane-mfgs.html > > > > > > but I recently purchased (and returned) a scanner that was listed as > > being > > > fully supported on that list because no matter what I did, I couldn't > > > get it to work right with xsane or scanimage. Though I purchased it > > used, > > > so it's possible it may have simply been broken from the get-go. > > > > > > Does anyone happen to know of a scanner that is *known* to work well > > > with OpenBSD? > > > > Well, I just bought a CanoScan 9000F MkII specifically because it was > > marked as fully supported on that list, and I can say it does NOT work > > on OpenBSD; scanimage -L detects it just fine but attempting to scan > > gives an I/O error. As a workaround I plugged it into a Linux laptop, > > started saned, and scan seamlessly from OpenBSD with scanimage's network > > support, until I find the time to make a proper bug report. > > > > In the past I used a CanoScan LiDE 20 quite regularly from OpenBSD, but > > that was several years ago. > > > > -- Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
