On Tuesday 27 November 2018 16:07:18 Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> Hi Nick,
> 
> Nick Holland wrote:
> > So far, with one or two exceptions, everyone complaining about this has
> > a One Big Partition disk layout.  A bad idea, not suggested, and I don't
> > think you will get much sympathy.
> 
> yes of course (TM).. I won't get much sympathy, but it is the best
> set-up for a dual-booting laptop it works for every OS I test and worked
> until 6.3 for me.
> For other set-ups I use different partitioning schemes, but I suppose in
> the past twenty years or so, we all had our issues with disk layouts.
> 
> > I know of one machine that behaves as you describe with a very modest
> > (smaller than suggested) root partition, but I'm feeling very alone
> > here. :D
> 
> what is the actual size limit? from where? I wonder that I cannot even
> boot the old kernel which worked.. at the previous boot!
> 
> I cannot shuffle the partitions, I cannot even reinstall from scratch,
> since I am unable to boot from an USB key with the installer image, it
> crashes both the 6.4 installer image as the old 6.3.

The specific "heap full" issue that can be triggered by using a single large 
partition is not likely to be at fault here - if you cannot boot the ramdisk 
(bsd.rd/installer) for 6.3 or 6.4 from a USB key, then something else is 
presumably up (unless you're actually trying to load the installed kernel or 
ramdisk from the hard disk). 

> All important data is backed up, but I need to reinstall at least and
> cennot even do that. Of course booting abd being able to copy a last
> snapshot of my home directory would be even best, to retain my profiles.
> 
> Should I try boot from optical media? could that help? I suppose not...
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Riccardo

Reply via email to