On 10/03/06, A Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A thought suddenly occurs. Perhaps big companies that use OpenBSD do not > want to disclose their use by donating because they fear that this might > give their competitors an advantage(now their competitors know what OS > they're using), or might help crackers/s-kiddies/etc. attack that > company now that they know what OS they're running (this is not an > attack on OpenBSD's security. I'm saying that anybody could take a > secure OS and make it insecure, even multi-million dollar corporations)
I don't get how you've come up to this strange conclusion... Since when does OpenBSD not accept anonymous donations?
