On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:22:21PM +0100, chefren wrote:
> On 2/8/07 3:09 PM, mickey wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:02:32PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> >>hmm, on Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 02:06:45PM +0100, mickey said that
> >>>On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 10:13:29AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> >>>>hmm, on Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 07:40:52PM -0500, Nick Holland said that
> >>>>>It means translation is stupid, but we keep doing it. :)
> >>>>it is not really the translation that got me worried
> >>>>(although wouldn't it be more consistent to use the n x 255 x 63
> >>>>version everywhere?) but the different number of sectors..
> >>>>thanks for the great explanation.
> >>>who gives a flying fuck?
> >>>bios is using it's own geometry and we are using ours.
> >>>how about you ask those spammers to send dick measurements in meters?
> >>perhaps this could go into the faq?
> >
> >what? dick measurement techniques?
>
> OpenBSD is about pro active security, those techniques should be
> integrated into the kernel.
this is a part of my plan right after i finally commit my
optimised xml parser for kernel. it has also asm implemetation
for vax (requires CIS-XML microcode though).
cu
--
paranoic mickey (my employers have changed but, the name has remained)
