On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 01:45:06PM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:18:16PM +0000, Jeff Rollin wrote: > | On 14/02/07, Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | > > | > Artur Grabowski wrote: > | > > "Stephan A. Rickauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > > > I did read your FAQ but I can't see how it rebuts what has > | > > > just been said. You seem to be happy with signing NDAs. If the > | > > > result is a readable and understandable GPL'ed driver, > | > > > companies will be even less motivated to release programming > | > > > documentation. This will lead to a GPL-lock-in since you > | > > > simply replace the vendor not willing to share specifications > | > > > with an NDA'ed GPL developer not willing to share those, but > | > > > GPL code only. > | > > > | > > Which is exactly what the GPL people want since that's the whole > | > > point of the license. Otherwise they wouldn't be using the > | > > GPL. Duh. > | > > | > Nah, RMS doesn't want this. A lot of `GPL people' don't want this > | > at all. > | > > | > This deal is meant to divide. > | > > | > | And this discussion isn't? There are already plenty of divisions within > the > | FOSS world - between the F and OS of FOSS, between Linux and BSD, between > | the various BSDs. It's not as if TdR started OpenBSD to continue > | contributing to NetBSD, is it? > | > | And yet when a driver is released under the BSD licence, which conflicts > | with the GPL, when do we hear the bitching about it on the BSD side? Wait, > | what's that? Oh, we don't? > > When vendors open up their docs, all profit. When one signs an NDA, in > the end, no one profits. > > Besides, what is keeping Linux from including BSD licensed drivers ? I > was under the impression that they have done this in the past. How > does a BSD licensed driver conflict with the GPL ? I've heard that the > two-clause BSD license should be compatbile with the GPL...
oh come fucking on! do not start this bsd vs gpl crap again! cu -- paranoic mickey (my employers have changed but, the name has remained)