Marc Espie wrote: > ... > You've got a choice of: Or
4) not up on the OpenBSD projects goals and current licensing requirements Some of that is probably due to the low profile of OpenBSD (low-profile is good, though) and the yammering of the FreeBSD crowd (which both includes a lot of MSFTers, and takes it upon itself to represent all *BSD). I realize it's good fun in Redmond to poke at RMS, however, that will not inform the public about the advantages of OpenBSD. The only purpose there is to make everyone look bad. Articles and other means of providing information about OpenBSD will increase knowledge of OpenBSD. Regards, -Lars
