On Dec 12, 2007 1:11 PM, knitti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/12/07, Darren Spruell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Why -current? I thought what had fallen behind from lack of resources > > was binary packages. Surely OPENBSD_4_2 (stable branch of ports tree) > > still has updated ports. > > > > Just build -stable packages from ports (like you did in the olden days.) > > to quote from the original mail from Nikolay Sturm (thanks to him for doing > this or much of it over some years) to misc: > "as you might have noticed, -stable ports have not been properly updated > in the last few months. Due to lack of resources, especially a > responsible maintainer, you cannot expect any updates to -stable for the > foreseeable future. Although some updates might happen, -stable should > be considered unmaintained."
Gah, I'll crawl back under my rock. Misremembered. DS
