Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > You too.
> > I still remember cheering when I read > > http://monkey.org/openbsd/archive/ports/0108/msg00460.html > > * From: Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:11:00 -0600 > * Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > I am just curious - why exactly were all the DJB ports dropped? > > Precisely because of what the commit message says: > > > "Removed qmail; license does not permit modification [camield > > 2001-08-14]" > > Sadly you're too quick to launch the 'hypocrit' word... > > http://www.openbsd.org/4.2_packages/i386/zangband-2.6.2p1.tgz-long.html > > According to Sourceforge: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/zangband > License: Other/Proprietary License > > Rui Nice try, but... every file in that CVS repository has: http://zangband.cvs.sourceforge.net/zangband/zangband/src/main.c?revision=1.44&view=markup ~~SNIP~~ /* * Copyright (c) 1997 Ben Harrison, and others * * This software may be copied and distributed for educational, research, * and not for profit purposes provided that this copyright and statement * are included in all such copies. */ ~~SNIP~~ According to the licence header on each one of those files, I don't see any reason why binary packages can't be made available... Go away troll.. You're not welcome here... -Nix Fan.
