> In addition, I thought that OpenSolaris was just a kernel, but it
> looks like the question had in mind a whole system. This
> miscommunication has the effect of making my statement appear to be an
> endorsement of a system.
Huh? OpenSolaris is just a kernel
That's what I thought. It _is_ free software, what there is of it.
But it isn't a usable solution. That's what I meant at the time.
Someone like you is not allowed to spread mistruths like this in the
media.
"Spread mistruths" is a distorted way to describe a couple of
misunderstandings. And as far as I know there is no way to forbid
anyone to do that. If I knew a way, I would do it.
Since you did it three times so rapidly, I am calling you a liar.
Mistakes are not lies. And these mistakes were misunderstandings
anyway.
And
since you refuse to undo your commercial support in Emacs and GCC, I
am going to call you a hypocrite.
I'm following the same principles that I apply to others.
I've explained both these principles and my actions; the readers
can judge all aspects for themselves.
