On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 03:06:46AM -0500, Jamie Gavahan wrote:
> Hello,
Hi.
> A quick search of the archives yielded these results* (among others):
>
> Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
You are wrong :P
named supports dynamic updates via allow-update { key ...; };
But the _DHCP_ server does not support dynamic updates.
I've never said the the dhcpd runs on the OpenBSD system.
So long,
Andreas.
P.S.:
> * http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=109755604901842&w=2
> * http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=115312797220810&w=2
> * http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=115296366703096&w=2
> * http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=117662121618527&w=2
They are all talking about the dhcpd of OpenBSD.
In my case the dhcpd comes from a Linux system and is a
ISC DHCPD v3.0.3 (which supports dynamic updates).
--
Windows 95: A 32-bit patch for a 16-bit GUI shell running on top of
an 8-bit operating system written for a 4-bit processor by a 2-bit
company who cannot stand 1 bit of competition.
