On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 09:32:39AM +0000, Jussi Peltola wrote: Hi. > It's reasonable to me: named doesn't need to modify master zones, so don't let > it do that. Principle of the least privilege. Using "static" zones ... I totally agree.
> Simpler fix: put dynamically updated zones in slave, which I have done for > years. O.K. But I am easy to confuse ;) I will never look into slave/ for dynamic zones. So I guess the best method - and to close this thread ;) - is to make a directory called ... say ... dynamic make it writable by named and put the zone file of the dynamic zones in it. Case closed ^^ Thanks for your input. So long, Andreas. -- Windows 95: A 32-bit patch for a 16-bit GUI shell running on top of an 8-bit operating system written for a 4-bit processor by a 2-bit company who cannot stand 1 bit of competition.
