Thanks very much! Problem Solved!

Vivek

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Vivek Ayer <vivek.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is what I had:
>
> /etc/hostname.carp0:
> up 184.159.29.23 vhid 1
>
> /etc/hostname.carp1:
> up 192.168.1.1 vhid 1
>
> I can use up or inet, right? The syntax would be something like this:
> inet 184.159.29.23 255.255.255.0 184.159.29.255 vhid 1, right? Then
> again, how would not having a netmask on the carp interface block
> certain subnets, but not all of them?
>
> I'll let you know once I've put in the netmask & broadcast to see if it works.
>
> Thanks a bunch!
> Vivek
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Jussi Peltola <pe...@pelzi.net> wrote:
>> CARP interfaces don't share L3 (IP) config with the parent, it's just
>> the physical interface where packets travel through. You need to
>> configure the netmask and ip address separately; they may even be in
>> completely different networks. If you don't specify a netmask for carp0
>> some default will be used, which is likely wrong.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 01:39:32PM -0800, Vivek Ayer wrote:
>>> carp0 doesn't automatically know the netmask of its parent? Well, that
>>> would explain the problem, right? Because I don't believe I fiddled
>>> with netmask in /etc/hostname.carp0.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Vivek
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Jussi Peltola <pe...@pelzi.net> wrote:
>>> > Everything to 184.159/16, that is, 184.159.x.x, goes out of carp0. You
>>> > need to specify a netmask for carp just like any interface, and in any
>>> > sane situation it should be the same as the parent's (I assume re0) when
>>> > they both have (different) addresses in the same subnet.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:35:05PM -0800, Vivek Ayer wrote:
>>> >> I tried that and here's some interesting information.
>>> >>
>>> >> First of all, I forgot to mention that this router was carped with
>>> >> another one. Not sure if this could be leading to the problem. But
>>> >> anyway, I did route -n show and for my external interface re0
>>> >> corresponding to carp0 here's the relevant info:
>>> >>
>>> >> Dest                   Gateway            Interface
>>> >> default               184.159.35.1     re0
>>> >> 184.159/16         link #6               carp0  <---
>>> >> 184.159.35/24    link #2               re0
>>> >> 184.159.35.1      (MAC addr)        re0
>>> >> 184.159.35.23    184.159.35.23   carp0
>>> >>
>>> >> The second line is interesting because it makes me wonder whether
>>> >> there's more to setting up the carp interface. I assume carp0 has the
>>> >> same netmask as re0, but if you can explain the second line, that'd be
>>> >> great.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> Vivek
>>> >>
>>> >> Just so that you don't get confused, I think in previous emails, I
>>> >> said 29 was my subnet and I'm now saying 35 when I meant to say 29,
>>> >> but you get the idea, whatever.
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Jussi Peltola <pe...@pelzi.net> wrote:
>>> >> > 1. ifconfig
>>> >> > 2. route -n show
>>> >> > 3. a network topology description
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > Jussi Peltola

Reply via email to