On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 01:17:37PM +0200, Pierre Riteau spoke thusly: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 05:48:00PM -0500, Denny White wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:48:58AM -0400, Dan Harnett spoke thusly: > > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:02:35AM -0500, Denny White wrote: > > > > Okay, dumb-ass me. Sitting here looking at the screen it finally > > > > dawned on me I'm not looking at 2 physical cpu's, per se, but > > > > instead 2 built onto one chip. Gee, I wish I would've come up > > > > with that beforehand instead of opening my mouth and removing > > > > any doubt in regards to my hardware ignorance. Only thing in > > > > my defense is I've never owned anything like that before. Before > > > > getting this laptop given to me, my fastest box was an aging dell > > > > dimension Pentium IV 2.66. No dual-cores, no dual-cpu's. Time to > > > > slink off now. ;) > > > > > > A processor can have multiple sensors even though it is only a single > > > physical package. It varies between processors. > > > > > > $ sysctl hw.model hw.sensors > > > hw.model=Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7500 @ 1.60GHz > > > hw.sensors.cpu0.temp0=44.00 degC > > > hw.sensors.cpu1.temp0=44.00 degC > > > hw.sensors.acpitz0.temp0=45.05 degC (zone temperature) > > > hw.sensors.acpitz1.temp0=44.05 degC (zone temperature) > > > hw.sensors.acpibat0.volt0=14.40 VDC (voltage) > > > hw.sensors.acpibat0.volt1=16.53 VDC (current voltage) > > > hw.sensors.acpibat0.watthour0=36.62 Wh (last full capacity) > > > hw.sensors.acpibat0.watthour1=1.83 Wh (warning capacity) > > > hw.sensors.acpibat0.watthour2=0.20 Wh (low capacity) > > > hw.sensors.acpibat0.watthour3=36.45 Wh (remaining capacity), OK > > > hw.sensors.acpibat0.raw0=0 (battery idle), OK > > > hw.sensors.acpibat0.raw1=0 (rate) > > > hw.sensors.acpiac0.indicator0=On (power supply) > > > hw.sensors.acpithinkpad0.temp0=45.00 degC (TMP0) > > > hw.sensors.acpithinkpad0.temp1=34.00 degC (TMP1) > > > hw.sensors.acpithinkpad0.temp2=34.00 degC (TMP2) > > > hw.sensors.acpithinkpad0.temp3=38.00 degC (TMP3) > > > hw.sensors.acpithinkpad0.temp4=24.00 degC (TMP4) > > > hw.sensors.acpithinkpad0.temp6=24.00 degC (TMP6) > > > hw.sensors.acpithinkpad0.fan0=0 RPM (fan) > > > hw.sensors.iwn0.temp0=56.00 degC > > > hw.sensors.aps0.temp0=34.00 degC > > > hw.sensors.aps0.temp1=34.00 degC > > > hw.sensors.aps0.indicator0=On (Keyboard Active) > > > hw.sensors.aps0.indicator1=Off (Mouse Active) > > > hw.sensors.aps0.indicator2=On (Lid Open) > > > hw.sensors.aps0.raw0=507 (X_ACCEL) > > > hw.sensors.aps0.raw1=513 (Y_ACCEL) > > > hw.sensors.aps0.raw2=507 (X_VAR) > > > hw.sensors.aps0.raw3=513 (Y_VAR) > > > > Yup, so I've learned. Thanks, Dan. Like I said before, never > > owned anything that modern before. ;) But, since last night, > > I've done a lot of reading up on it. Should've done it before > > but I didn't know I was gonna be given a new dual-core laptop. > > That doesn't happen very often. Not around here anyway. ;) > > It's just that the code creating hw.sensors.cpuX.temp0 is a little > different between i386 and amd64, so amd64 shows one sensor for each > core (but with the same temperature) while i386 shows only one sensor > for all cores.
I'm trying now to figure out why fan isn't shown. I know there's some power handling going on. I can get the screen to turn off, just in X, but when I run sysctl hw.sensors there's nothing about the fan. Denny White -- =============================================================== () ASCII ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments =============================================================== GnuPG key : 0x1644E79A | http://wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net Fingerprint: D0A9 AD44 1F10 E09E 0E67 EC25 CB44 F2E5 1644 E79A ===============================================================
