> On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 17:14 -0400, you wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Bernd Siggy Brentrup <b...@free-it.org> > wrote: > > > AFAICT from at(1), the code is still mostly T-Rex's implementation. > > > > > > You may want to have a look at https://launchpad.net/~at-ng for > > > a reimplementation from scratch, The client side is mostly done > > > I don't think one small bug is sufficient reason to replace a > > generally working BSD licensed program with a GPL one. > > The oldest sources by Thomas Koenig (aka T-Rex) I have at hand (3.1.8 > iirc) definitely carry a GPL license statement. I'm curious in how > far openBSD's source code for at differs to warrant a different > license if at all possible. Up to now I only checked the manpage. > > btw, Debian's at package has collected ~60 open bug reports over the > years, dunno if they apply to openBSD's at too.
Really. How interesting. The word on the street is that your stuff is the biggest pile of shit. 400 bug reports, I hear. Or, wait, did you want to start a constructive discussion? It sure doesn't look like it. Let's keep it simple. Why don't you just go away, and stop acting the fool?
