On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 01:30 +0000, Jacob Meuser wrote: > On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 02:48:59AM +0200, Bernd Siggy Brentrup wrote: > > Hi Ted, > > > > better not wake up sleeping dogs :) > > > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 17:14 -0400, you wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Bernd Siggy Brentrup <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > AFAICT from at(1), the code is still mostly T-Rex's implementation. > > > > > > > > You may want to have a look at https://launchpad.net/~at-ng for > > > > a reimplementation from scratch, The client side is mostly done > > > > > I don't think one small bug is sufficient reason to replace a > > > generally working BSD licensed program with a GPL one. > > > > The oldest sources by Thomas Koenig (aka T-Rex) I have at hand (3.1.8 > > iirc) definitely carry a GPL license statement. I'm curious in how > > far openBSD's source code for at differs to warrant a different > > license if at all possible. Up to now I only checked the manpage. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/usr.bin/at/LEGAL?rev=1.1
Thanks for this link which obviously clarifies the issue. I'm Cc'ing Joey Schulze who told me maintaining at for Debian was an upstream job too back in 2000. Regards Siggy -- O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org+ |10 days until|bsb-at-psycho-dot-informationsanarchistik-dot-de| |www.Ubucon.de|or: bsb-at-psycho-dot-i21k-dot-de| +-------> ceterum censeo javascriptum esse restrictam <--------+
