On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 19:35 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 17:14 -0400, you wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Bernd Siggy Brentrup <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > AFAICT from at(1), the code is still mostly T-Rex's implementation. > > > > > > > > You may want to have a look at https://launchpad.net/~at-ng for > > > > a reimplementation from scratch, The client side is mostly done > > > > > I don't think one small bug is sufficient reason to replace a > > > generally working BSD licensed program with a GPL one. > > > > The oldest sources by Thomas Koenig (aka T-Rex) I have at hand (3.1.8 > > iirc) definitely carry a GPL license statement. I'm curious in how > > far openBSD's source code for at differs to warrant a different > > license if at all possible. Up to now I only checked the manpage. > > > > btw, Debian's at package has collected ~60 open bug reports over the > > years, dunno if they apply to openBSD's at too. > > Really. How interesting. > > The word on the street is that your stuff is the biggest pile of > shit. 400 bug reports, I hear.
> Or, wait, did you want to start a constructive discussion? > It sure doesn't look like it. Let's keep it simple. Why don't you > just go away, and stop acting the fool? If you answer your own questions, who is acting like an idiot then? The word goes Theo de Raadt himself is driving away ppl from using openBSD by pissing them of publicly. Bye Siggy -- O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org+ |10 days until|bsb-at-psycho-dot-informationsanarchistik-dot-de| |www.Ubucon.de|or: bsb-at-psycho-dot-i21k-dot-de| +-------> ceterum censeo javascriptum esse restrictam <--------+
