Of course it didn't! What they should have done was put the backup server on the same VM!!! Problem solved!
On 1/13/10, Peter N. M. Hansteen <pe...@bsdly.net> wrote: > Marco Peereboom <sl...@peereboom.us> writes: > >> I have seen people virtualize a file server and domain controller on a >> single machine. Which is awesome because now you get free >30% loss of >> IO performance. You know it keeps bandwidth use lower and latency >> higher. Exactly what lusers like. > > Oh, try what a medium sized educational institution not too far from > here did: put several file servers on the same physical rig (sharing > one gigabit ethernet interface), then start whining when backups to > $elsewhere don't complete overhight. > > -- > Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team > http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/ > "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic" > delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds. > > -- Sent from my mobile device http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk "This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity." -- Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation. "Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks factory where smoking on the job is permitted." -- Gene Spafford learn french: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30v_g83VHK4
