> You are not the only one with limited time. Sorry for the late reply, but > also I wanted to provide details as to why. > > I realize.
> > The short of it is that in it if you look at it. It add more work to the > developers by asking them to send in stuff. They already have it done for > some. So, why duplicate the list. It will just get out of sync and obsolete > very soon. Plus they have a list, so I think the most logical and efficient > way to do it would be just like this: > > 1. Name > > 2. Very short blurb for area the todo cover > > 3. URL to the developers list. > > And that's it. > Very good point. In my haste to volunteer I overlooked the extra burden placed on others by my suggested approach. If you'd like I can do what you recommended. > The only think that this gives me as an idea that may have some merit is > that a list of user group might be good to have and I can add that to the > site. But again, that should be as minimal as possible. > > City, state or province, country, language and URL to the site for the > group. If no URL, then some details could be added and that may actually get > some usage may be. > > But keeping the time needed to maintain anything like this is a plus and > not required any more from the developers have to be the goal. But again, I > am not sure it's even good, but like I said, I am not oppose to. Like > everyone else I have very little time and I didn't reply before, nor this > morning to your email at 5:32AM when I saw it at 7:30 AM EST as I just > finish an other project and I do need to get some sleep sometime as little > as it might be and I have some kind of a life too and kids to take care of > as well. > I have similar obligations. Thank you for the salient points.
