Ok, I understand now, this should work indeed, probably a small regression
in recent code, will look into it tomorrow and come up with a fix.
Gilles
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 04:27:19PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> On 5/17/10 4:41 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >You are confusing me :-)
>
> I am very sorry! That's the last thing I want to do.
>
> So, I will try to make it very short and as clear as I can. (;>
>
> I simplify the configuration to the minimum and as I still not able to
> get the virtual part working, I try something below that is simple and
> appear to be logical to me. If I am wrong, then take the 20 pound hammer
> and beat me over the head with it. I can't see it!
>
>
>
> if I have the following smtpd.conf:
>
>
> listen on "lo0"
> listen on "dc0"
>
> map "vdomains" { source db "/etc/mail/vdomains.db" }
>
> accept from all for local deliver to mbox
>
> #accept from all for domain "opensipd.com" deliver to mbox
> #accept from all for virtual "vdomains" deliver to mbox
>
> accept for all relay
>
>
> The only two things I will do here between the restart of smtpd are to
> either comment out only one or the other below:
>
> #accept from all for domain "opensipd.com" deliver to mbox
> #accept from all for virtual "vdomains" deliver to mbox
>
> one at a time to test it.
>
> With
>
> accept from all for domain "opensipd.com" deliver to mbox
> #accept from all for virtual "vdomains" deliver to mbox
>
> No other changes, I can send email to
>
> [email protected]
>
> and I get it into the root local account.
>
> That works.
>
> now, if I reverse it:
>
> #accept from all for domain "opensipd.com" deliver to mbox
> accept from all for virtual "vdomains" deliver to mbox
>
> I should be able to get the email in the same local root account if the
> vdomains have the following in it:
>
> # cat vdomains
> [email protected] root
>
> and I had created the vdomains.db with the makemap as this:
>
> # /usr/libexec/smtpd/makemap -t aliases vdomains
>
> Am I not understanding this properly?
>
> It got to work right?
>
> But it doesn't. I always get the error:
>
> 530 5.0.0 Recipient rejected: [email protected]
>
> I haven't been able to get the virtual to works once and I can't say how
> many variation I did. Way to many to list them and a few totally stupid
> as well, but just in case I tried.
>
> So, isn't the above is valid and should work as a simple test?
>
> Daniel
--
Gilles Chehade
freelance developer/sysadmin/consultant
http://www.poolp.org
