On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:10:47PM +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:07:58 +0200
> Henning Brauer <lists-open...@bsws.de> wrote:
>
> > * Gregory Edigarov <g...@bestnet.kharkov.ua> [2010-08-17 09:29]:
> > > Qmail??? Postfix??? "easiest to use"???? Oh, please don't... I would
> > > even not give a dime to exim, which of the "big guys" I love the
> > > most, in the terms of ease of configure. So now I definitelly see
> > > OpenSMTPD as a very viable alternative.
> >
> > exim is also the one with 80s design (even sendmail abandoned that)
> > and shit code.
> > pretty much ANYTHING else is a better choice.
>
> Agreed. That left us to only the choice between sendmail/OpenSMTPD :)
> I would definitelly advise for Opensmtpd, but not yet, at least not
> before the 4.8 rel will be rolled, though in 4.7 it is quite stable,
> and runs perfectly on a handful of my places.
>
Unfortunately it still lacks features required for many setups, I only
use it and recommand to use it for people who have simple setups and
who know their setup isn't going to evolve for a while...
Gilles
--
Gilles Chehade
freelance developer/sysadmin/consultant
http://www.poolp.org
